FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : Video Cards : ASUS Extreme AX600XT/HTVD Review
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Tony Hawk's Project 8 Preview Screenshots [30] (3)


Sins of a Solar Empire Beta Review [Prelim 2] (5) by Itchyeyes
S.T.A.L.K.E.R Screenshot - An Artistic Touch (1) by sushrukh
The Witcher Review, The Polish RPG that could. (6) by McStu
Clive Barker's Jericho Review (Round 2) (6) by jacobvandy
Half Life 2 (Round 2) *runs* (8) by exe3
Finalists and Final Rules (6) by FS-Lyle
It'll take a crowbar... (1) by ronniedobbs
The Ultimate SLI Gaming Rig is Home!! (1) by StryderSilverton
Guild Wars Gets a Bad Review (9) by Joluha
The Orange Box Review in 500 Words! [Preliminary #2] (7) by Swatt

More Blogs >>




ASUS Extreme AX600XT/HTVD Review
July 19, 2004   Brandon Sandman Bell > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | +User Review | Article Images(17) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Introduction


ASUS Extreme AX600XT/HTVD Review [ ASUS X600 XT meets the ATI reference X600 XT @ 1024 x 768 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
ASUS X600 XT meets the ATI reference X600 XT


PCI Express is coming

With Intel’s PCI Express interface finally up and running, graphics card manufacturers are already scrambling to supply the add-in board (retail) and OEM markets with cards.

ATI and NVIDIA have taken different approaches to their PCI Express products. Whereas ATI has taken existing products and modified them for use with PCI Express, NVIDIA has decided to slap a bridge chip on their PCI Express cards. Polling the board manufacturers at Computex last month, all were in unanimous agreement that ATI’s native solution was the better way to go, and the reasons weren’t just limited to performance: NVIDIA’s bridge solution takes up a fair amount of space on the PCB, limiting board manufacturers in the flexibility of their board designs. This is especially important in the value segment, where smaller board designs are frequently used to help cut costs. In fact, many value boards utilize half-height PCBs for this reason.

ASUS Extreme AX600XT/HTVD Review [ GeForce PCX 5750, note the heatsink covering the bridge chip @ 1024 x 768 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
GeForce PCX 5750, note the heatsink covering the bridge chip

ASUS Extreme AX600XT/HTVD Review [ Both boards are based on the same basic design @ 1024 x 768 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Both boards are based on the same basic design


Adding to manufacturer’s concerns is the heat output of NVIDIA’s bridged design, which requires a heatsink to keep the bridge chip cool. This adds even more to the board cost, and again, plays an even greater role in the value segment, where margins are razor thin.

Because of these factors, ASUS is limiting themselves to just two NVIDIA PCI Express products here in the North American market, the GeForce PCX 5900-based EN5900 and PCX 5750-based EN5750, while they’ve announced half a dozen PCI Express parts utilizing ATI’s RADEON X600 and X300 line of VPUs.

Already retail boards based on the GeForce PCX 5750 and RADEON X600 XT cores have begun shipping and we’ve received samples from multiple manufacturers, while GeForce PCX 5900 and RADEON X600 PRO/X300 should begin to trickle in the coming weeks.We’re here today to review ASUS’ top-of-the-line mainstream offering, the EAX600XT/HTVD.

The ASUS Extreme AX600XT/HTVD is based on ATI’s RADEON X600 XT VPU. While its name implies it’s derived from the X800, fundamentally the X600 XT shares its roots with ATI’s RADEON 9600 XT, which is nothing more than an enhanced RADEON 9600 PRO. ATI has implemented the same 4x1 pipeline configuration found in RADEON 9600 XT, as well as integrating a 128-bit wide memory interface, only the memory’s clock frequency has been increased from 300MHz (600MHz effective) in RADEON 9600 XT to 370MHz (740MHz effective). ATI has kept the core clock frequency at 500MHz.

This change increases memory bandwidth by 2.2GB/sec, which was one of the RADEON 9600 XT’s key shortcomings. As a result, performance is enhanced at high screen resolutions and/or in situations with anti-aliasing or anisotropic filtering in use. In fact, we witnessed performance gains of up to 15% in many games for ATI’s X600 XT over the RADEON 9600 XT in our preview article from last month.

Once again ASUS is looking to differentiate themselves from ATI and other board manufacturers with their X600 XT lineup, much like they did with their RADEON 9600 XT and 9800 XT cards. In fact, in many ways ASUS has built a better X600 XT board than ATI!


    Show me the card! Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
Read this Media-Blog entry!» HA! (1)
by stalker_loner (247) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 4 months ago

Sponsored Links
:
[GO]


 Hottest Topics
Should Nintendo rush a new Wii to market? (40)
Microsoft Hardware unit: 'Say Goodbye To Laser' (26)
PC Games Industry Going All RIAA on Pirates (24)
It's official: Comcast to cap users bandwidth (22)
FiringSquad Rumor Patrol: Apple, NVIDIA (18)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


Nikon D70s  Trish Stratus  Remortgage  Mortgages  MySpace Codes
FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2008 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved