FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : CPUs : AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and Athlon 64 4000+ Review
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 



Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 Debut Screenshots [6] (0)

[Entry] Crank That S#!t Up Video Contest (5) by Animehero
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-4) (0) by nGAGE
2nd Entry for Crank That S#!t Up! (2) by CamoDaGreat
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-1) (0) by nGAGE
My crank that S#!t Up entry! (13) by zin_onos
The Nvidia "Crank That S#!T Up" Quiz Show, Part 2 (6) by mohawkade
Crankin' it up today... and tomorrow! (8) by Slipdisk
Crank It Up! (11) by Kilos
Nvidia+Socom Cranks that $#%^ UP!!!!! (4) by mrinfinit3
Crank That S#!t Up! ENTRY :) (2) by CamoDaGreat

More Blogs >>




AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and Athlon 64 4000+ Review
October 18, 2004   Chris Crazipper Angelini > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | +User Review | Article Images(4) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Introduction


The first Athlon 64 FX processor debuted a little more than one year ago and AMD hasn’t looked back since. Even after Intel retaliated with its Extreme Edition family, the Athlon 64 FX maintained a performance advantage and came in at a lower price to boot. Since then we’ve seen increased operating frequencies and a transition from Socket 940 to the more user-friendly Socket 939.

Indeed, very little has changed within the AMD64 architecture. Most of the improvements have been external: adding support for unbuffered memory at the high-end, keeping up with Intel’s platform improvements by way of enhanced Serial ATA, Gigabit Ethernet, and multi-channel audio support, and boosting the 800 MHz HyperTransport link up to 1 GHz.

While that last improvement didn’t seem to do much for existing AGP chipsets (there aren’t any components capable of saturating 8 GBps on the desktop), it will come into play more in the near future. The big news for the rest of 2004, next to the processor announcements transpiring today, is a progression towards PCI Express core logic. Both the Athlon 64 FX-55 and Athlon 64 4000+ are enabled with those 1 GHz HyperTransport links, which will match up well to NVIDIA’s upcoming nForce4 chipset and its ancillary subsystems.

AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and Athlon 64 4000+ Review [ The Athlon 64 FX-55 and A64 4000+ @ 1024 x 768 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
The Athlon 64 FX-55 and A64 4000+

AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and Athlon 64 4000+ Review [ Bottom of the chips @ 1024 x 768 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Bottom of the chips


But of course, the real news here today is a pair of processors that will carry AMD into the holiday buying season and past Intel’s upcoming platform revision, it hopes. Dubbed the Athlon 64 FX-55 and Athlon 64 4000+, the two chips bear a lot of enthusiast appeal and promise to improve gaming through minor bumps in frequency.

Athlon 64 FX-55


Indeed, the incremental model number update from FX-53 to FX-55 represents a straight frequency increase and nothing else. Formerly at 2.4 GHz, the new flagship in AMD’s flotilla runs at 2.6 GHz. And while a handful of AMD64 processors have made a jump to 90nm manufacturing, the latest Athlon 64 FX is still etched used Fab 30’s 130nm process. It does, however, incorporate AMD’s first implementation of strained silicon-on-insulator, which improves the switching performance of transistors by increasing the drive current in N- and P-transistors. There aren’t any official announcements on the technology to speak of, but representatives at AMD claim that the company will discuss it further in the future.

As a result of the silicon process changes, the Athlon 64 FX-55 features different power specifications than either of its predecessors. Maximum heat dissipation is now up to 104W from 89W previously. Apparently, that’s enough of a difference to warrant a new cooling spec too, as the heatsink that shipped with AMD’s evaluation sample included an array of four heat pipes to accelerate the dissipation of heat across its aluminum fins. The heatsink is manufactured by AVC, who currently claims that there aren’t any plans to take the product into retail. However, other companies, specifically Thermaltake, claim that many existing heatsinks should suffice (we confirmed its own Venus 12 works well, even in an overclocked environment). AMD’s Damon Muzny also notes that all retail Athlon 64 FX-55 processors include an approved cooling solution.


    More Athlon 64 FX-55 Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
Read this Media-Blog entry!» Blow That S#!t Up! (8)
by Synchronous Failure (1147) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 33 months ago


 Hottest Topics
Two new GRID 2 gameplay trailers speeding your way (1)
Minecraft PC sales surpass the 8 million mark (0)
New Grand Theft Auto 5 trailer debuts main characters (0)
Crysis 3 'The Fields' campaign gameplay trailer (0)
New Far Cry 3 trailer focuses on co-op campaign (0)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2013 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved