Unfortunately, here comes the tricky part. While ATI has now officially demonstrated their 512MB technology, that doesn’t mean you’ll be able to go out and buy a 512MB X850 XT tomorrow. As of right now, ATI has no official plans to introduce a 512MB card to the public.
We put the words “official” in bold font because ATI hasn’t exactly nailed down their final plans for this board. You just may seem them produce a 512MB card, or they may not. Yesterday’s demonstration was considered a “technology preview” of what is to come (hint: think next generation product) and what ATI is capable of doing today. 512MB graphics cards are being shipped to game developers however, and will be used in the production of upcoming games, particularly those from Ubisoft and Valve Software.
If ATI doesn’t step up to the plate however, that doesn’t mean that one of their board partners won’t. Technically, Tier One board partners such as ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, PowerColor, or Sapphire could take on the challenge of producing a 512MB card if they decide to do so, as the board design is pretty similar to existing X850 XT cards. So far no one has announced plans to produce such a card, but that doesn’t mean that it won’t happen at some point in the near future.
Conclusion
What’s our take on this? Obviously seeing 512MB on a graphics card is impressive, but we’d like to know more about the board’s performance.
ATI claims a 20-30% performance improvement over a stock X850 XT in DOOM 3, multiple areas in Half-Life 2, and Far Cry, allowing the 512MB card to even outperform the more expensive X850 XT Platinum Edition, but only one resolution was given: 1600x1200 with 6xAA and 16xAF. This is hardly enough information to come to any definite performance conclusions about the board. Does the additional memory introduce so much latency that the 256MB X850 XT significantly outperforms the 512MB at lower resolutions, or is the performance impact barely noticeable? We’d also be curious to see how the board performs at 2048x1536, which is finally becoming a viable resolution for today’s high-end cards. Hopefully the additional RAM brings performance benefits to additional scenarios beyond just 1600x1200 with 6xAA/16xAF.
X850 XT-512 performance. Source: ATI
The other potential downfall of a 512MB X850 XT card would be price. Already 256MB cards retail for $500, doubling the amount of memory would likely drive the price up to $600 or more. This is well outside the budget of most gamers, and with next generation cards right around the corner (remember, ATI has been pretty good at introducing new high-end products every 6-9 months), dropping $600 or more on a 512MB card may not make much sense to a lot of people.
But at the same time, the words “rational” and “value” don’t really apply to the hardcore enthusiast crowd. These guys always want the latest and greatest, and a 512MB X850 card would certainly earn you major bragging rights. This is where ATI or one of their board partners could step in, as a 512MB card could certainly boost their prestige among enthusiasts.
This is why we wouldn’t be surprised to see someone eventually produce a 512MB X850 card at some point in the near future; the opportunity is just too great to pass up. NVIDIA and Gainward certainly knew what was coming, pre-announcing a water-cooled GeForce 6800 Ultra with extreme clock speeds just days before ATI's public demonstration.
ATI has obviously done the research and testing on a 512MB card, so why not produce a limited edition run of say 500 cards. All of ATI’s Tier One partners produce other products besides video cards, so you could round the package out with other goodies such as a motherboard or consumer electronics device, or better yet, really jazz up the game bundle.
Regardless of what is or isn’t produced though, we’ll certainly be eager to report on whatever happens!
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 Review
With dual processing cores clocked at 3.33GHz, Intel's Core 2 Duo E8600 is a serious performer, but it's an even more impressive OC'er. Check out Brandon's thoughts on the CPU in our Core 2 Duo E8600 review!
Madden 09 Review
With solid graphics and gameplay, there's a lot to like with EA's latest iteration of Madden, but Brett reports that there are still some annoying AI quirks that hold the game back. Read on for the full review!
Sapphire Toxic Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon 4850 Dual Slot Review
The Sapphire Toxic 4850 is loaded with features. The card ships with an all-copper dual slot, dual heatpipe cooler from Zalman, the VF900-Cu. But that's not all, the board is also OC'ed to higher speeds than any other 4850 card on the market. In this article we officially review the Sapphire Toxic 4850 as well as its younger brother the 4850 Dual Slot. Both cards deliver cooling that's significantly improved over ATI's cooler. Find out how well these cards perform in today's review!
Soul Calibur IV Review
Are the additions of Darth Vader and Yoda enough to carry the Soul Calibur series? Yes and no. Brett finds the fighting enjoyable, but Namco Bandai's isn't perfect. Read the pros and cons in today's review!
FiringSquad Rumor Patrol: Apple, NVIDIA
FiringSquad's top secret division looks at technology rumors floating around the 'net. In this round: NVIDIA and Apple!
Palit GeForce 9800 GT Sonic Review
Rather than rely on NVIDIA's reference board design for the 9800 GT, Palit has incorporated a number of improvements into their 9800 GT Sonic, including a 3-phase board design, dual-slot cooling, and OC'ed clock speeds. How does the 9800 GT card perform in comparison to the popular GeForce 8800 GT and a host of other GPUs? Find out in this article!
Budget Gaming PC Roundup
In this article, Jakes takes a look at three different $1,000 gaming PCs from CyberPower, iBuyPower, and MainGear PC. Each company took a different approach to tackling the $1,000 budget, and one company really stood out with their extraordinary build quality. See how the various PCs fared in our Budget Gaming PC Roundup!
PhysX Performance Update: GPU vs. PPU vs. CPU
After posting our PhysX story last week, many of you wrote in asking for PPU benchmarks, so today we've delivered! Armed with our original BFG PhysX card, we booted up an X48 Core 2 QX9650 testbed and re-ran the benchmarks. See how the PPU fared against the CPU and GPU in this quick article!
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Performance Preview
With 1600 shaders, 2.0GB of GDDR5 memory, and 2.4 TeraFLOPS of graphics horsepower, the Radeon HD 4870 X2 is one impressive performer. See how the card stacks up running 8xAA against SLI GeForce GTX 280 and 260 in single card and 4-Way CrossFire. We've also thrown in 24xAA benchmarks as well. Is 2GB of memory really necessary? All the answers lie inside!
PhysX Performance with GeForce
Later this month NVIDIA will open up GeForce-based PhysX processing to their entire range of GeForce 8/9 and GTX 200 GPUs. In this article we take a look at their performance (as well as ATI's Radeon HD 4000 series), in four different PhysX applications. What kind of performance can you expect? Find out inside!