FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : Video Cards : GeForce GTX 295 Early Performance Test
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Call of Duty 4 Review Screenshots [20] (0)

What is so cool about Gigabyte’s Ultra-Durable 3 technology (0) by SuperCharge
How to Overclock Guide (2) by SuperCharge
Guitar Hero 3 - The thing that should not be (UPDATED) (5) by Beefysworld
13.1 miles of EVGA (0) by Odoyle721
Rodent Device (2) by PS2Fish
EVGA: my number 1 (0) by imagination
OverClocking Boot Camp (3) by Odoyle721
Sins of a Solar Empire Beta Review [Prelim 2] (5) by Itchyeyes
Funniest thing to do with the OCZ name (4) by SuperCharge
"I need a vacation..." (4) by ICDP

More Blogs >>




GeForce GTX 295 Early Performance Test
December 18, 2008   Brandon Sandman Bell > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(30) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Specifications


When the first GeForce GTX 295 rumors surfaced on the internet, it was widely expected that NVIDIA would base the card entirely off the 216-shader GeForce GTX 260. Using this GPU as the foundation for the card made the most logical sense in order to keep costs as well as power consumption and heat down.

However, NVIDIA ultimately ended up borrowing aspects of both the GTX 260 and the GTX 280 for the GeForce GTX 295.

Like the GeForce GTX 280, the GPUs inside GTX 295 contain 240 stream processors apiece, with a grand total of 480 stream processors for the entire card. Unlike the GTX 280 however, the GeForce GTX 295 shares the same clock speeds as the GeForce GTX 260 – 576MHz for the graphics core while the stream processors operate at 1242MHz.

The memory subsystem is also carried over unchanged from the GeForce GTX 260, with the GTX 295 featuring a 448-bit memory interface with 1.792GB of GDDR3 memory (896MB per GPU) clocked at 1.0GHz (2.0GHz effective).

As a result, its paper specs lie somewhere between the GeForce GTX 280 and the GTX 260. The following chart summarizes the differences among the various GeForce GTX 200 GPUs:

GeForce GTX 200 Series Comparison
GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 260 216-core
Manufacturing Process55-nm65-nm65-nm
Core Clock576MHz602MHz576MHz
Shader Clock1242MHz1296MHz1242MHz
# of Shaders480240216
Memory Clock1,000MHz1,107MHz999MHz
Memory Interface448-bit512-bit448-bit
Memory Size896MB x 2 1GB896MB
Total Memory Bandwidth112GB/sec x 2141.7GB/sec111.9GB/sec
ROPs563228
Texture Filtering Units1608064
Texture Filtering Rate92.2 GigaTexels/sec48.2Gigatexels/sec36.9Gigatexels/sec
Display Connectors2 x Dual-Link DVI-I
1 x HDMI
2 x Dual-Link DVI-I2 x Dual-Link DVI-I
Power Connectors1 x 6-pin
1 x 8-pin
1 x 6-pin
1 x 8-pin
2 x 6-pin
Max Board Power289W236W182W
Price$499~$330-$400~$230-$280
AvailabilityJan 8th, 2009NowNow




As you can see, despite the graphics horsepower inside the GeForce GTX 295, the board has a respectable power consumption figure: 286W. For those of you keeping score, this is the exact same power rating as the Radeon 4870 X2. NVIDIA’s specifications recommend a 680W PSU for the GeForce GTX 295.

Priced at $499, the GeForce GTX 295 is also priced right in the middle of GTX 280 SLI and GTX 260 SLI. In comparison Radeon 4870 X2 cards start right around $460 on Newegg, which is where all of our pricing data comes from. The GeForce GTX 295 will hit retailers on January 8th of next year, but we were granted access to a preproduction board to run some preliminary benchmarks to whet your appetite ahead of the launch.

GeForce GTX 295 Early Performance Test [  @ 1600 x 1200 ] > View Full-Size in another window.


GeForce GTX 295 Early Performance Test [  @ 1600 x 1200 ] > View Full-Size in another window.


GeForce GTX 295 Early Performance Test [  @ 1600 x 1200 ] > View Full-Size in another window.



This early access did come with a few conditions however. Namely game titles tested were limited to five holiday launch games: Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, Fallout 3, Far Cry 2, and Left 4 Dead, plus one title of our own choosing. Naturally since it’s still the most demanding game on the market we chose Crysis.

The final condition was that we couldn’t run power consumption and acoustic tests. Don’t worry though, our preproduction card scored well here with the card running quietly and with respectable power draw. NVIDIA said they wanted to save something for us to talk about for the official launch day. How nice of them. NVIDIA didn’t tell us we couldn’t OC the board, which is one of the aspects we were most interested in anyway. First let’s take a peek under the board’s black shroud though…


Back! Page 1     Cracking open the GeForce GTX 295 Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» What is so cool about Gigabyte’s Ultra-Durable 3 technology (0)
by SuperCharge (4) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 6 months ago


 Hottest Topics
New Modern Warfare 2 PC petition created (33)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 PC Review (33)
ATI Radeon 5970 Performance Preview (12)
BioShock 2 special edition includes vinyl LP (11)
Activision hopes to monetize some aspects of CoD multi (11)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2009 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved