Xeon specs
| Pentium III Xeon |
| Features |
| Manufacturer |
Intel |
| Availability |
June 1999 |
| Connector |
330-contact slot connector (slot-2) |
| Initial speeds available |
500 MHz, 550 MHz |
| Projected speeds (for 99) |
600 MHz, 600+ MHz (H2 '99) |
| Supported chipsets |
440 GX, 450 NX |
| Initial FSB speed |
100 MHz |
| Projected FSB speed |
133 MHz (H2 '99) |
| Future chipsets |
Carmel (133 MHz), Profusion |
| L2 Cache speed |
Full-CPU speed |
| L2 Cache Placement |
On PCB |
| Processor Extensions |
MMX, SSE |
The P3 Xeon Processor
Marketed as a high-end workstation and server solution, to most people the Xeon line appears to be a cost-is-no-object pure performance chip, affordable only to those who need the power at any price. However, in today's increasingly specialized environments, this isn't always the case.
More and better cache
There are two main differences that separate the Xeon line with the standard Pentium line. The first is cache implementation. The Pentium II and Pentium III processors use a backside cache of 512KB, which runs at ½ the speed of the CPU core. This means a 400Mhz P2 has 512KB of cache running at 200Mhz. A 500Mhz P3 has 512KB of cache at 250Mhz. The Xeon line breaks with this by supporting variable amounts of L2 cache, with models ranging from the standard 512KB to even more expensive models carrying 1MB and 2MB. L2 cache on a Xeon also has the additional benefit of running at full CPU speed. A 500Mhz P2 Xeon can have an L2 cache of 512KB, 1MB, or 2MB, which will run at 500Mhz.
| Cache Sizes and Speeds |
| Features |
Cache Size |
Cache Multiplier |
Cache Speed |
| PII 300 |
512KB |
.5x |
150 MHz |
| PII 450 |
512KB |
.5x |
225 MHz |
| PIII 450 |
512KB |
.5x |
225 MHz |
| PIII 500 |
512KB |
.5x |
250 MHz |
| PIII Xeon 450 |
512KB, 1MB, 2MB |
1x |
450 MHz |
| PIII 500 |
512KB, 1MB, 2MB |
1x |
500 MHz |
As you can see, the Xeon benefits from a significant jump in L2 cache speed, even from the fastest Pentium III. This is probably where the much of the Xeon's speed increase will be realized, and it accounts almost wholly for the increased cost of the processor. As you are probably thinking, in this regard the Xeon shares more of a resemblance with Intel's current low-end Celeron, with full-speed on-die L2 cache.