
Biostar Contest Group 



NVIDIA SLI GIVEAWAY CLUSTER 

Fireside Chat with Brandon 

Final Round Intel Video Challenge 

AMD Contest Group 

Final Round FiringSquad-Intel Edito... 

Dans test cluster 

Round 3 Editors Challenge Sponsored... 

Top 10 Challenge Round Sponsored by... 

Game quiz 

Editors Challenge Sponsored by Inte... 

Video Challenge Sponsored by Intel ... 

FiringSquad Editors Challenge Round... 

Lord Of The Rings Online Beta Conte... 

FiringSquad Video Challenge - Preli... 

FiringSquad Editors Challenge Round... 

Top Secret Project 

Camaro Fan Club 

GX-Warspite (113) 

Willow (136) 

GX-Brandon (283) 

DaugWok (85) 

indigo196 (249) 

bloc (38) 

FS-Pongky (1132) 

doomtrooper (724) 

WallShadows (2350) 

FS-Lyle (167) 

p4l1ndr0m3 (227) 

LordLatte (4) 

smut (226) 

owenjd (2) 

Napoleon_Nomad (20) 

Discobiscuits (62) 

DareDevilCP (17) 

FS Demo (40) 

FS-Sandrzzz (1) 

360gadgeteer (5) 

Kessandra (779) 

gnomed (2) 

CanadaDave (303) 

Mishkin (30) 

chentsen (41) 

TheHeartless (3) 

Kristopher (5) 

Draxuss (4) 

LynnE (1) 

AnneMarie 

Luq89 (5) 

xmeb (30) 

|

|
|
|
4 entry(ies) in this category
|
 Time to Step things up. (13 comments ) by: DanT (389) | Posted in cluster Editors Challenge Sponsored by Intel Round 2 Posted 18 months ago ( edited 18 months ago ) in category DEFAULT Round 2 Rules
What a fantastic turn out. Clearly we have had some of the best content anywhere on the web since this contest started. If there was a way for FiringSquad to hire all 30 of the qualifiers, we would surely do it.
You have all read the results so far. The people to beat at this point in this competition are:
From Prelim 1:
Millroy: Dear Star Trek: Legacy (for the PC)
jacobvandy: Windows Vista: The Future of PC Gaming (Part 1)
Suibhne: Review: Dark Messiah of Might & Magic (single player)
From Prelim 2:
Power666: The CPU and GPU engaged for marriage
darrellwu: Graphics: Style and Photorealism
dasickninja: Bigfoot Killer NIC Review.
Some of you didn't qualify in the first preliminary but came back in the second and really stepped up the pace. So don't be discouraged if you are not at the top of the list at the moment. Remember that each article will be based on its own merit. You've made it this far which proves you have the talent.
Now for the rules.
In this round you are going to have to convince us that you really know what you are talking about. Your mblog can't be an editorial piece. It can not be a fluff piece. In this round your review must combine both hardware and a game. We will allow any combination of any device provided that it is gaming related with any game that you play (Whoopass Soda is not a gaming device). As an example, you can discuss how different video cards affect the frame rates of a specific game. Or, you can discuss how different game settings affect network game play or playability based on video resolution. Part of the judges job will be to judge how pertinent your argument is to the game and hardware in question and will rate you on this relevance along with your score for writing style, accuracy, and entertainment value.
You must also include at least 3 images in your mblog that support your argument.
You may also include video capture to support your argument, although it will only have a very small influence on the judges scores (5 points max per judge out of 100 possible points). It might however have a bigger impact on the FiringSquad readers scores (still worth 300 out of a possible 700 points).
You are only allowed to submit one mblog for this round. The sooner you submit, the more page views and votes you will receive. Remember to use a pertinent and catchy title. This can have a HUGE impact on page views as we have seen from previous rounds. It might not hurt to read up on search engine optimization (SEO) and how you can drive traffic to your article. Paid advertising will get you disqualified.
If you need help or want some feedback from the editors, you'll need to email us no later than Friday March 9th to fs.feedback@firingsquad.com. We will attempt to get as much feedback to you as possible as quickly as possible.
To summarize:
No editorials.
Must include affects of hardware on game or vice-versa.
One mblog per participant.
Minimum 3 images to support your opinion.
Video capture optional (small point advantage given if effective).
Help available if requested before Friday March 9th.
Submissions start Wednesday March 7th.
Submissions close midnight Wednesday March 14th.
Top 10 qualifiers move to the next round.
Do not hesitate to post in the comments section of this cluster if you have general questions.
Finally, we wish you the best of luck and look forward to reading your excellent submissions. |
| 
| 13 User Comment(s) • 6 root comment(s) |
ExpertPenguin (3) Mar 07, 2007 - 05:29 pm
| | Question...When you say "combine both hardware and a game," Does that mean that the review has to be on a certain type of hardware, and how it affects the game in question....Or does it have to be on a type of hardware along WITH a review of the game running on it? » Login to reply to this Power666 (25) Mar 07, 2007 - 06:35 pm
| | I'm wondering about this as well. A hardware review would probably fly as its effect in most cases can be measured (frame rate, CPU utilization ect). I'm really wondering if a good game review would be able to fit. The main focus of a game review typically focuses on the content in the game, not the hardware it is running on (though it is always worth mentioning what the game is running on, if only briefly). » Login to reply to this GX-Alan (78) Mar 07, 2007 - 08:43 pm
| Good questions. Any reviewer can get a piece of hardware and then run a bunch of benchmarks on it and then post those numbers. It really doesn't tell the readers that much. Likewise, game reviews are easy in that you just write a paragraph about graphics, sound, gameplay, etc. and hope that you'll be OK.
What we're looking for is a writer who understands both.
It doesn't matter if you have killer equipment or crappy equipment. Here's some hints.
1) You have a crappy video card but want to upgrade to a better one.
Why do you want to upgrade? (Because there is some game that you want to play at maximum quality that you currently cannot). So, write an article about that. Tell the readers about that game you're playing or that game you want to play and show the difference between how you experience it and how you want to experience it.
2) You have a crappy video card but choose not to upgrade.
Why not? (Because you've figured out how to choose an acceptable level of quality settings.) Show us why the fancier video card doesn't help, or why going from "minimal quality" to "medium quality" just isn't worth it, and how you have to go to "high-quality" to get the results you want.
3) You want to show someone the difference between 512MB and 1GB of RAM. Which benchmarks do you choose?
4) You have a digital SLR and are trying to decide which RAW processor to use.*
The more ideas I throw out, the less valuable they are. You can use these ideas, but make it exceptional. Make it personal. You don't want to compete against 5 other people writing about the same exact topic.
Questions to ask yourself:
1. What are you trying to prove? What are you trying to discover?
2. Why should a reader care?
3. Have I presented the evidence in such a way that the "only logical conclusion" is your conclusion.
* In the past, FiringSquad has occasionally done non-gaming stuff. This is REALLY hard to do, and I'd caution you from doing this. That said, if you swear you have an awesome topic that's marginally related to gaming and you want to get it approved for Round 2, you can email me and we'll discuss it. Again, I strongly recommend against this due to the risk of having a dud article.» Login to reply to this |

|

|






» Note: You need to be logged in to write a comment!Login here, or if you don't have an account with FiringSquad, register here, it's FREE! |

My Media-Blog categories
|